Arizona’s ESA Program Undermines Homeschool Freedom
Homeschooling has always been more than just a method of instruction; it’s a declaration of educational independence. It allows parents the freedom to shape their children’s learning, guided by conscience, faith, and individual needs, rather than state mandates. This freedom has led to innovation, deep family engagement, and personalized growth for countless students and their parents.
The Empowerment Scholarship Account (ESA) program was introduced in Arizona as a beacon of educational choice, promising parents the liberty to direct their children’s education. But to access state funds, families must surrender their homeschool affidavit, be reclassified as an ESA Student, and sign a contract with the Arizona Department of Education, which is the same agency that oversees a system where only one in four eighth graders are proficient readers (National Center for Education Statistics, 2024). Why would any parents of a homeschool family place themselves under the oversight of a department with such a record?
The Allure and the Trap
On the surface, ESA funds appear empowering, offering families a way to educate their children outside government schools using public dollars. But this support comes at a steep price: parents must comply with state-imposed terms, trading educational independence for financial assistance.
This raises a critical question: can education funded by the state truly remain independent of state control? Logic and precedent confirm that it cannot.
From Autonomy to Regulation
Homeschooling has long been a refuge for families who desire to customize education around their children’s unique needs that is free from state mandates. ESA participation, however, requires families to leave the refuge of independence and come under the jurisdiction and compliance with state-approved vendors, materials, subjects, and spending categories. Legally, students become government-educated students, and those receiving ESA dollars become paid employees or agents of the state of Arizona. This is a slow but steady erosion of the very autonomy that defines homeschooling.
Consider California
In California’s publicly funded charter school programs, families often face highly prescriptive requirements. Access to public funds has transformed independent education into a highly regulated endeavor. Parents must often:
- work with state-credentialed teachers who oversee instruction
- choose from a list of approved curricula
- submit coursework for regular review and assessment
- log instructional time that meets minimum daily and annual requirements
- maintain full vaccination compliance
- submit documentation for compliance and auditing
While these requirements vary by program, they reflect the typical oversight level of state-funded education options (California Department of Education, 2024; Homeschool Association of California 2024; California Homeschool Network, 2024). The volume of required documentation and monitoring introduces significant state presence into the learning environment.
Arizona Isn’t There . . . Yet
The trend lines are clear. Arizona’s program, initially managed by ten staffers, now employs fifty-two full-time bureaucrats, costing taxpayers $4.5 million in 2024 alone (Arizona Department of Education, 2024). The Governor’s proposals include (Office of Governor Katie Hobbs, 2024):
- background checks
- fingerprinting
- government-mandated price controls
- expanded auditing authority
- state educational standards
- mandatory disclosures of the rights parents give up when they enroll
That last one should tell you everything you need to know.
More regulations are coming. Always. One memo, amendment, or “clarification” at a time. Can you name any government program that becomes less regulated over time?
Compliance and the Slippery Slope
Accepting Arizona ESA funds already requires parents to adhere to a list of:
- approved expenses
- from approved vendors
- in support of approved curricula
- in approved subjects
This repetition is not incidental—it underscores how deeply state control is embedded in every aspect of ESA participation. This kind of micromanaged oversight doesn’t just risk uniformity—it engineers homogenization. By enforcing “approved” everything, the state constructs a narrow, state-defined mold for learning—flattening the landscape of education and stifling the diversity, creativity, and innovation that are hallmarks of genuine homeschooling freedom.
Furthermore, the administrative requirements, such as detailed record-keeping and regular reporting, introduce layers of bureaucratic complexity. These demands can deter parents from pursuing personalized educational paths by subjecting their individual choices to bureaucratic scrutiny.
Hidden Costs
Beyond the ideological concerns, ESA programs come with enormous financial costs. In fiscal year (FY) 2024, Arizona’s program ran up a $738 million bill—blowing past budget estimates and contributing to a $1.4 billion deficit across FY2024 and FY2025 (Office of Governor Katie Hobbs, 2024).
Worse still, over 70% of ESA users in 2023 were never enrolled in public school (Office of Governor Katie Hobbs, 2024). That means taxpayers are now funding education they weren’t previously responsible for—without reducing any existing public-school expenditures. It’s not “school choice.” It’s double billing the taxpayer.
Preserving Educational Freedom
The ESA program may offer financial support, but it does so at the cost of the very freedom homeschooling was designed to protect. Parents must weigh the temporary benefit of state funds against the permanent consequences of state control.
To safeguard the integrity of homeschooling, it is imperative to maintain a clear boundary between state-funded education and independent learning. Only by preserving this distinction can we ensure that homeschooling remains a true alternative, free from the constraints of government control.
Conclusion
The ESA program, though well-intentioned, represents a hazardous shift toward increased state ownership of homeschooling. By accepting public funds, parents unintentionally erode the autonomy they seek and open the door to the same regulatory mechanisms that have contributed to the decline of Arizona’s public school system. As Arizona navigates the complexities of educational choice, families must remain vigilant—resisting short-term subsidies that threaten long-term freedoms—to preserve the liberty that makes homeschooling a truly independent and vital educational path.
Enjoy other articles on ESAs here.
Written by:
